Southern California Mortgage Blog

History and the "Mortgage Crisis"

Wow! What a week, this past one, the third week of September 2008!

So much has gone on, and frankly, it is very difficult for me to understand a lot of it.

One article that I have read used the phrase, “the credit market has seized up and has made it impossible for anyone to get mortgage loans, etc. (sic).” That pretty much summed it up for me and my business.

Any time that I have a problem getting a loan for a man with 817 middle credit score and 45% down, on the purchase of a single family home in San Diego means that things have gone beyond “hinky”.

With each loan application I take, I summarize with this apology: “I’m sorry. Though I have asked you for everything that my experience tells me we will need, the times are challenging. It is very possible that things that have never had to have been documented before will be asked for before we finish. I believe that we will present a very good loan package. We can get this done if we work together. Please don’t take any additional requests personally. It is simply the need for the underwriter to cover all the bases because he or she fears their own job loss.”

I was very saddened, and then relieved, that the Treasury Dept. had taken over Fannie and Freddie because I believe that those two businesses will become much more predictable as to the standards that must be met for a “good loan”. FHA loans have always made it easier for 1^st time homebuyers to invest in the American Dream and I believe the new standards that will be set for FNMA and Freddie will do the same for all loan programs.

So many people have asked me, “How did all of this happen in the mortgage industry?” I am not qualified to answer that on anything more than my experience in real estate for 26 years and good business sense, but here is my answer:

During the boom there were many nights when I worked very late at the office to keep my loan pipeline on track. I remember thinking many times that “how will these credit scores hold up if a borrower with a 680 credit score buys a home with no money down and loses his job?” If you can’t make the payments, you can’t make the payments regardless of your credit scores.

I also knew that any market that white-hot was going to cool. Sadly, I also knew that many loan officers and real estate agents only look at the “deal” and not how the transaction will play out in their client’s lives.

Then, there is the issue of so many negative amortization loans that were funded where even the loan officer didn’t understand them well enough to explain them to their borrower. I am a proponent of neg-am loans; they definitely have their place. Many, many homeowners, me included, have been able to buy homes and keep them because of this type of loan. As long as the borrower has owned property before and understands how the loan will work, they are good loans.

The final big reason that I could see was that all of the different types of loans that were introduced went far beyond common sense. In terms of the loan programs and the underwriting and approval of those loans, many of this was simply bad business and without common sense. I am and have always been very proud to work with General Mortgage in San Diego. Their level of professionalism has always been superior.

Human nature and/or capitalism will exploit every avenue until it proves harmful and then regulation will bring it back into balance.

In the coming years, I believe that the standard of education for the client and the loan officer and real estate agent will improve. It has to! The price is too high to fail and I am not just talking about money. Our clients trust us with their financial lives which directly affects their quality of life.

The need to prepare the clients’ credit report, carefully consider the loan program being offered, and understand the entire process and teach that will be the professional’s duty to obtain the best results for the client.

I challenge anyone, still in the business, to bring the level of their education up on an ongoing basis. I promise, it will be expected.

Mary Supinger

Copyright 2008 All rights reserved

Short Sale vs. Foreclosure: The True Impact On Credit

I have gotten the impression from the many real estate agents are unaware that the effect of a Short Sale on their clients credit report isn't as bad as Foreclosure or Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure.

I have actually seen a lot to the contrary in advertising. It scares me because I see a lot of lawsuits in the future regarding this.

Short Sales, Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, or full blown Foreclosure are all weighted the same in determining credit score computations. This information comes directly from MyFICO.com.

Earlier this year, FNMA announced that a record of foreclosure on a credit report will require that 3 years must pass prior to placing a borrower into a FNMA insured loan. At the beginning of June, that time frame was extended to five years. That is five years from the sale date. Remember, that the home owner does have redemption periods after default and because of this, the sale date is the actual date of the foreclosure.  An owner wouldn't necessarily know this without researching the actual date.

The Mortgage Bankers Association announced that one in every 200 homes with mortgages is facing foreclosure.  That is a lot of bad news to many families.

A year ago I correctly predicted that short-refis would exist. They do now.....it is called Loan Modification and I can help you with that.

Finding out that my agent said a short sale wouldn't hurt me as badly would have me gunning for someone to pay. I would rather it wouldn't be you. Thanks for reading.

PMI Tax Deduction Extended Through 2010

On 12/14/2006, I posted an article on Mary Supinger's Credit & Mortgage Blog at RealBlogging.com Tax Deductible PMI:

On 3/20/2007, I updated that article to read that the 2007 deduction for private mortgage insurance had not yet been extended.

I am happy to report that legislation has been passed that will extend the tax deduction for private mortgage insurance through 2010.

The tax deduction is available to a personal residence and a non-rental second home.

The homeowner’s loan that include the PMI must have originated after January 1^st of 2007. It can be for a purchase or refinance, but the loan amount may not exceed the acquisition loan amounts.

In other words, if you bought a house for $100,000 and had a 1^st mortgage for $80,000 and a 2^nd mortgage for $10,000, you could refinance into a new loan with PMI for $90,000. If, you could somehow get a loan for $95,000, you would be able to deduct the PMI for the loan amount up to $90,000 only.

The legislation also carries with it the caveat that your family may earn no more than $100,000 per year or the mortgage insurance will not be 100% tax deductible.  For each $1,000 of annual household income earned in a year, the deduction is reduced by 10%. Once a family’s income is over $109,000, the PMI deduction will not apply.

The household income is determined by the adjusted gross income prior to any itemized deductions. This legislation is aimed at helping first time homebuyers with the purchase of a new home.